Middle Range Theory Discussion

Middle Range Theory Discussion

/: It is vital that nursing practice be guided by theories or framework. Select and discuss a Middle Range Theory that would be instrumental in the development of your proposed quality improvement project.

Following the guidelines bellow.

Use at least 500 words, APA 7 format and scholarly references NO older than 5 years old.

The possible project theme is: Determine the effectiveness of Anti neuropathic such as Gabapentin and pregabalin on the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy instead opioids as a first line treatment

Middle Range Theory Discussion

Participation Requirements
The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of each week. Two scholarly sources references are required, unless stated otherwise by your professor.

The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Wednesday day and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s).

Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points.

Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Middle Range Theory Discussion

Check tips on how to do your Nursing Assignments.

Inclusion of DNP essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable. (10%)

Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)

Inclusion of DNP essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable. (10%)

Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)