Week 2 Discussion AIP

Week 2 Discussion AIP

Mrs. Davis, a 58-year-old female with a history of hypertension and diabetes, is admitted to the medical-surgical unit with acute kidney injury (AKI). She presents with decreased urine output, elevated serum creatinine, and electrolyte imbalances. The healthcare team prescribes a fluid and electrolyte management plan to address Mrs. Davis’s renal failure.

The nursing team is responsible for implementing the prescribed interventions, closely monitoring Mrs. Davis’s fluid and electrolyte balance, and providing patient education to ensure optimal outcomes. Check tips on how to do your case study assignment. 

Assessment of Fluid Balance:

How would you assess Mrs. Davis’s fluid status, considering factors such as vital signs, urine output, and clinical manifestations of fluid overload or deficit?

Week 2 Discussion AIP

Electrolyte Imbalance Recognition:

Given Mrs. Davis’s renal failure, what electrolyte imbalances might be anticipated, and how would you monitor for signs and symptoms of abnormalities in sodium, potassium, calcium, and phosphorus levels?

Fluid Restriction and Management:

The healthcare team prescribes a fluid restriction for Mrs. Davis. How would you implement and monitor her fluid intake, and what strategies might be employed to manage thirst and maintain patient compliance?

Dietary Considerations:

Mrs. Davis has dietary restrictions related to her renal failure. How would you educate her about dietary modifications to manage electrolyte imbalances, especially potassium and phosphorus?

Week 2 Discussion AIP

Medication Administration and Monitoring:

Mrs. Davis is prescribed medications to address electrolyte imbalances. How would you administer and monitor the effects of medications such as loop diuretics, phosphate binders, and potassium-lowering agents?

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.